If this happens in reality, this will be Deepika Padukone’s fourth project with Sanju star, Ranbir Kapoor. Earlier, the two biggies have worked in three films including Bachna Ae Haseeno (in the year 2008), Yeh Jawaani Hai Deewani (in the year 2013) and Tamasha (in the year 2015).
After delivering back to back hits, Ranbir Kapoor and Deepika Padukone have become the most in-demand pair in Bollywood.
Every time the two stars hit the silver screen, their interpersonal chemistry has always put a special impression on the viewers. Now, if news doing the rounds are to trust, the two stars may join hands once again for Luv Ranjan’s next directorial venture.
Deepika Padukone has heard the screenplay for his next project featuring multi-talented actor Ajay Devgn and Ranbir Kapoor.
As per a source, “Deepika Padukone has just heard the synopsis. Nothing has been finalized yet. But it is an exciting project and just the fact that she has shown interest is a good sign.” The report further states that apart from acting Deepika will also co-produce the project.
In recent times, the two stars were also seen together at Junior Kapoor’s pre-birthday bash. The two were also accompanied by their dear friends comprising Ranveer Singh, Karan Johar, Alia Bhatt, Shah Rukh and Aamir Khan.
The image got shared by KJo and needless to say, the pic made all web users confused. In the image, Ranbir Kapoor had his arms around the rumored pair – Deepika and Ranveer, whilst Alia and KJo were witnessed matching in red.
When we talk about the film projects, Ranbir Kapoor is busy shooting Ayan Mukerji’s Bramhastra with his lady love Alia, whilst Deepika has recently given green signal to Meghna Gulzar’s yet-to-be-named movie, which will be based on the life of acid attack survivor Laxmi.
The news doing the rounds was that Deepika Padukone and Ranveer Kapoor will get married during the month of November, and that marriage preparations were happening. Now the reports said that the two have pushed back their marriage to the first few months of the coming year.
Comments
